San Francisco, CA Privacy & Surveillance: License Plate Readers (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing law
- Admin. Code Ch. 19B
- Approval body
- Board of Supervisors
- ALPR named
- listed as Surveillance Technology
- Recent ALPR ordinance
- Ord. 255-23, eff. 1/19/2024
Summary
San Francisco law names automatic license plate readers as regulated Surveillance Technology, so SFPD cannot acquire, borrow, or expand ALPR use until it publishes a Surveillance Impact Report, obtains a COIT recommendation, and wins Board of Supervisors approval of a Surveillance Technology Policy by ordinance.
“Surveillance Technology” means any software, electronic device, system utilizing an electronic device, or similar device used, designed, or primarily intended to collect, retain, process, or share audio, electronic, visual, location, thermal, biometric, olfactory, or similar information specifically associated with, or capable of being associated with, any individual or group. Surveillance Technology” includes but is not limited to the following: international mobile subscriber identity (IMSI) catchers and other cell site simulators; automatic license plate readers; electric toll readers; closed-circuit television cameras...
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: 2026 S-96: Codes: last updated to include changes made by legislation through Ordinance 133-26, File No. 260686, approved July 23, 2026, effective August 23, 2026).
Full Breakdown
Administrative Code Chapter 19B builds its regime on the definition in Sec. 1. Surveillance Technology covers any software, electronic device, or system using an electronic device that is used, designed, or primarily intended to collect, retain, process, or share audio, electronic, visual, location, thermal, biometric, olfactory, or similar information specifically associated with, or capable of being associated with, any individual or group. The definition then lists covered tools by name, and automatic license plate readers appear on that list alongside IMSI catchers and other cell site simulators, electric toll readers, and closed-circuit television cameras.
Naming ALPRs expressly removes any argument that plate readers fall outside the chapter. The consequence is procedural: before SFPD can acquire, borrow, or expand its use of ALPRs, the department must publish a Surveillance Impact Report, obtain a recommendation from COIT, and secure Board of Supervisors approval of a Surveillance Technology Policy passed as an ordinance. That policy is what governs how the devices are deployed, how long the data is retained, and the sharing rules for what they collect. San Francisco's most recent ALPR-specific measure on file here is Ordinance 255-23, effective 1/19/2024.
Violations & Fines
A Department that acquires or uses ALPR data outside an approved Surveillance Technology Policy is out of compliance with Chapter 19B; the Board of Supervisors can enforce compliance and require an ordinance covering continued use under Sec. 19B.5(b).
Frequently Asked Questions
Can SFPD add new ALPR cameras without Board approval?
Are license plate readers covered by SF's surveillance law?
What must happen before the Board votes?
What does the approved policy control?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in San Francisco
California rules heatmap·Compare San Francisco to another location·View the California privacy & surveillance overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.