Scottsdale, AZ Environmental Rules: Erosion Control (2026)
Key Facts
- Boulder feature setback
- 20 feet minimum for construction
- Runoff rule
- Directed to natural channels, best practices
- Watercourse threshold
- 50 cfs in a 100-year event needs review
- Reviewing body
- Development Review Board
- Conviction fee
- $50 to McDowell Mountain land fund
Summary
In Scottsdale's Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) Hillside Landform, Zoning Ordinance Sec. 6.1070.C requires all storm runoff to be directed toward natural channels using best practices for erosion control, and bars construction within 20 feet of boulder features to guard against boulder rolling, rockfalls and landsliding on steep terrain.
2.Unprotected slopes shall be protected from focused stormwater flows.3.All storm runoff shall be directed towards natural channels using best practices for erosion control.4.Minimize removal of native vegetation from areas not located in construction envelopes.5.Minimize incidental impact from other natural hazards including erosion, subsidence, boulder rolling, rockfalls, flooding, flood related mud slides, unstable slopes and landsliding relating to the site and surrounding property.
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: Code of Ordinances: Supplement 80).
Full Breakdown
C sets Hillside Landform Site Design Criteria that the Development Review Board applies to site plans located in the hillside landform outside a subdivision plat. The stated purpose is to protect lives and property from disasters tied to poorly designed hillside development and to mitigate erosion, boulder rolling, rockfalls and landsliding. The operative erosion rules require all construction to be set back at least 20 feet from boulder features, unless the Development Review Board approves a design that still protects public safety; require unprotected slopes to be protected from focused stormwater flows; require all storm runoff to be directed toward natural channels using best erosion-control practices; and require minimizing removal of native vegetation from areas outside approved construction envelopes.
These sit alongside broader ESL design standards in Sec. G, which require exterior materials and colors to blend into the desert setting and require watercourse modifications, including walls or fences crossing a natural wash, to follow the standards in Chapter 37 (Floodplain and Stormwater Regulation) and the city's Design Standards & Policies Manual. A request to modify, redirect or divert a watercourse carrying 50 cfs or more in a 100-year event must show the change results in equal or enhanced open space quality, restores removed vegetation, and does not worsen drainage on adjacent properties.
Violations & Fines
Under Sec. 6.1100.C, a violation of any ESL Ordinance provision, including the hillside erosion-control standards in Sec. 6.1070, is enforced through the violation and penalty provisions of Article I of the Zoning Ordinance (Secs. 1.1401-1.1402), meaning a civil sanction up to $2,500 with a $500 minimum for a non-permitted condition. A conviction under Sec. 6.1100 also triggers a mandatory $50 fee deposited into the Trust for McDowell Mountain Land Acquisition, on top of any other fine.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Scottsdale control erosion on hillside lots?
How close can I build to a boulder feature in Scottsdale's ESL district?
Do I need approval to redirect a wash on ESL-zoned property?
What is the penalty for an ESL erosion-control violation in Scottsdale?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Scottsdale
Compare Scottsdale to another location·View the Arizona environmental rules overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Erosion Control in Nearby Cities
How other cities in Maricopa County handle erosion control.