Redding, CA Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)
Key Facts
- Trigger
- Only after a formal 'dangerous dog' finding
- Deadline
- 10 business days to microchip
- Not general
- No citywide pet microchip mandate
- Related duty
- Also requires spay/neuter within 10 business days
- Penalty
- Misdemeanor for violating conditions, § 7.13.150
Summary
Redding has no general pet microchip mandate, but once a dog is formally classified dangerous after an administrative hearing, its owner has ten business days to implant an identification microchip, one of more than a dozen mandatory conditions the city can impose under RMC § 7.13.110.
A.No person shall own, maintain or possess a dog determined to be a dangerous dog, except upon one or more following conditions that the hearing officer or board may specify in a written order: ... 10.The owner or keeper of the dog must, within ten business days of a final determination that the dog is dangerous dog, obtain an identification microchip embedded under the dog's skin.
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: Code of Ordinances: Supplement 48).
Full Breakdown
Chapter 7.13 governs dangerous dog classification. After the city manager's designee initiates a hearing under § 7.13.080 and a hearing officer or the administrative hearings board finds a dog dangerous, § 7.13.110(A) lists conditions the board may impose in a written order, including that within ten business days the owner or keeper must obtain an identification microchip embedded under the dog's skin (§ 7.13.110(A)(10)). Related conditions adopted the same day include spaying or neutering the dog within the same ten-business-day window (A)(7), displaying a distinctive 'dangerous dog' license tag at all times (A)(8) and (§ 7.13.140), securely confining the dog so it cannot reach adjoining property (A)(9), carrying liability insurance of $50,000 to $300,000 if the owner also owns the premises (A)(6), and notifying the city if the dog escapes, dies, is sold, or moves (A)(12)-(13).
Hiding, releasing, or transferring a dangerous dog without the administrative hearings board's written authorization is a separate misdemeanor under § 7.13.110(B). Because the microchip duty attaches only after a dangerous dog finding, ordinary pet dogs and cats in Redding carry no citywide microchip requirement; the license-tag and rabies-vaccination rules in Chapter 7.12 apply to them instead.
Violations & Fines
Failing to microchip a dangerous dog within the ten-business-day deadline, or violating any other condition set under § 7.13.110(A), exposes the owner to enforcement action, and any violation of the written maintenance order or of Chapter 7.13 generally is a misdemeanor under § 7.13.150. Hiding, releasing, or transferring the dog without the administrative hearings board's written authorization is independently a misdemeanor under § 7.13.110(B).
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Redding require all dogs to be microchipped?
How soon must a dangerous dog be microchipped?
What happens if I don't comply with the microchip condition?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Redding
California rules heatmap·Compare Redding to another location·View the California animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.