Broomfield, CO Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing sections
- BMC §§ 6-20-020(C)(5), 6-20-030(A)
- Trigger
- Animal returned after unlawful-attack hearing
- Who pays
- Owner, at licensed veterinarian
- Registration required
- Central microchip registry plus animal control
- Voluntary incentive
- Microchip can waive part of $150 rabies fine (§6-16-250)
Summary
Broomfield does not require routine pet microchipping, but Municipal Code Section 6-20-020(C)(5) requires it as a condition of returning a dangerous animal to its owner after a municipal court hearing on an unlawful attack, and Section 6-20-030(A) makes a microchip mandatory for any animal involved in even a first unprovoked attack.
(C)The owner of an animal seized pursuant to this section shall be entitled to a hearing before the municipal court at the earliest date available to the court and the parties to determine if the animal shall be destroyed. ... (4)If the court determines that it is not appropriate to order the animal destroyed, the court may order the animal returned and to be kept under such circumstances as will ensure the safety of persons, property, or other animals in the community.(5)If the animal is to be returned to its owner, the court shall order the implantation in the animal of a unique identifying computer microchip by a licensed veterinarian at the owner's expense. The owner will be ordered to register the identifying microchip information with animal control and the central registry for such information.
Full Breakdown
Broomfield's general animal code does not mandate microchipping for ordinary pet ownership; routine identification instead relies on the rabies vaccination tag system in Chapter 6-16. Microchipping becomes mandatory only after an animal violates the unlawful-attacks chapter. Under Section 6-20-020(C), an owner of an animal seized for an unprovoked attack under Section 6-20-010 is entitled to a municipal court hearing to decide whether the animal will be destroyed. If the court determines destruction is not appropriate and orders the animal returned, subsection (C)(5) requires the court to order implantation of a unique identifying computer microchip by a licensed veterinarian at the owner's expense, and to order the owner to register that microchip information with animal control and the central microchip registry.
Section 6-20-030(A) applies the same microchip mandate even more broadly: for any unlawful attack defined in Section 6-20-010(A)(1) through (A)(3), whether or not the animal caused injury, the court must order microchip implantation and central-registry enrollment as part of sentencing. The microchip requirement also surfaces indirectly in Chapter 6-16: Section 6-16-250 lets a cat or dog owner who failed to register the animal for rabies get part of the minimum $150 fine waived by showing the animal already carries a registered identifying microchip, giving owners a financial incentive to microchip voluntarily even outside the attack context.
Violations & Fines
Failing to comply with a court-ordered microchip implantation after an unlawful-attack hearing is enforced as a violation of the court's order under Section 6-20-020 or 6-20-030, on top of whatever fine, jail time or destruction order already applies to the underlying attack; the implantation and registry enrollment costs fall on the owner, not the city.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is microchipping required for all pets in Broomfield?
Who pays for the court-ordered microchip?
Can microchipping reduce a fine for an unregistered pet?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Broomfield
Compare Broomfield to another location·View the Colorado animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.