Broomfield, CO Animal Ordinances: Breed Restrictions (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing section
- BMC § 6-20-010
- Basis for rule
- Behavior-based, not breed-specific
- First-offense fine (no injury)
- Minimum $150
- First bite/injury fine
- Minimum $300
- Second bite/injury penalty
- $750 fine plus 5 days jail
- Destruction authority
- Only municipal court, after hearing
Summary
Broomfield has no breed-specific ban, but Municipal Code Section 6-20-010 makes it unlawful to own any animal, of any breed, that causes an unprovoked bodily injury to a person or another animal, or that repeatedly charges a fence or the end of its lead in a way that would reasonably cause fear of imminent harm.
(A)It shall be unlawful to own an animal which:(1)Causes bodily injury to a person in an unprovoked attack, whether on or off the premises of its owner;(2)Causes bodily injury to a domesticated animal or livestock in an unprovoked attack while on or off the premises of its owner; or(3)When unprovoked, repeatedly charges against a fence in an attempt to attack or charges to the end of its lead in an attempt to attack or acts otherwise in a manner that would reasonably cause fear of imminent bodily harm. ... (C)It shall be unlawful for an owner of an animal to fail to take immediate and effective corrective action with that animal when it is in violation of any of the provisions of this section.
Full Breakdown
Section 6-20-010, in Chapter 6-20 (Unlawful Attacks), regulates dangerous animals by conduct rather than breed: it is unlawful to own an animal that causes bodily injury to a person or to a domesticated animal or livestock in an unprovoked attack on or off the owner's premises, or that repeatedly charges a fence, charges to the end of its lead, or otherwise acts in a way that would reasonably cause fear of imminent bodily harm. Subsection (B) lists seven circumstances that do not count as 'unprovoked,' including attacks that occur because the victim provoked the animal, was breaking up a dogfight, was attacking another person, was trespassing on the fenced portion of the animal's premises, or was attempting to capture the animal without authority.
Subsection (C) separately makes it unlawful for an owner to fail to take immediate and effective corrective action once an animal is in violation. Section 6-20-020 lets animal control officers impound a violating animal without prior notice, and if it cannot be safely seized, an officer may destroy it after reasonable capture efforts. An owner can demand a municipal court hearing before destruction, where the court weighs the animal's conduct, any prior violations, and any corrective steps taken, and only the court, not the officer, can order euthanasia. Section 6-20-030 escalates penalties for repeat violations by the same animal or household within three years and mandates additional court-ordered conditions.
Violations & Fines
A first unprovoked attack causing no injury draws a minimum $150 fine plus possible mandatory owner-education, kenneling or muzzling; a repeat attack by the same animal or household within three years raises the minimum to $450. Where a bite or attack injures a person or animal, the minimum fine is $300 for a first offense and $750 with a mandatory five-day jail sentence for a second offense within three years, and the court may order humane destruction.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Broomfield ban pit bulls or other specific breeds?
Can animal control destroy my dog immediately after an attack?
What excuses an animal from an 'unprovoked attack' charge?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Broomfield
How Broomfield compares: Cities with No Dog Breed Restrictions·Compare Broomfield to another location·View the Colorado animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.